Skip to main content

Tag: internet control

Silencing University Voices

Earlier this month, Beijing Normal University quietly deleted the social media account of Jingshi Scholars (京师学人), a student-run publication that had operated on campus for twenty years. No announcement was made to readers or former members as between 600 and 700 articles disappeared overnight. The account was listed as “voluntarily closed” (自主注销) — a bureaucratic formality that, according to former members, was not what had actually happened.

Student newspapers and other outlets in China have long occupied a rare and contested space. Operating nominally under university party committees (党委), they have sometimes managed, within narrow limits, to report on subjects that official outlets dare not touch. Jingshi Scholars tended to cover such issues as labor rights and the lives of migrant workers in the capital city, topics that can sit uneasily with the Party’s preferred narratives.

The move this month is just the latest in a series of moves against the publication. In November 2017, the editorial team was summoned by university authorities after publishing a sensitive article and forced to hand over editorial authority. The office space used by the publication was reclaimed by the university. The public account stopped updating, until the final deletion this year.

What happened to Jingshi Scholars over nearly a decade was compressed, at other institutions, into weeks. Between November and December 2024, at least 10 universities, including Fudan University (复旦大学), Wuhan University (武汉大学), and the Communication University of China (中国传媒大学), shut down more than a thousand WeChat public accounts (微信公众号) in rapid succession. Wuhan explained the closures as necessary for “improving online public opinion guidance” (提升网络舆论引导质效) — an invocation of the Party’s doctrine that media exist not to report, but to manage what people think.

Reflecting on the shutdown this month, one former member of Jingshi Scholars wrote that “the account can be deleted, but the hotpot smell has seeped into our blood — it won’t wash out.”

Whitelist Wipeout

Last month, China’s top internet control body, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) released its latest “whitelist” of approved news sources from which internet platforms are legally permitted to repost news content — a system that has become a cornerstone of information control under Xi Jinping. Journalists over at our Chinese-language sister publication Tian Jian (田間) combed through the list last week to compare it with the 2021 version of the roster. What did they find?

The most noteworthy change was the omission of a more outspoken news outlet, Sanlian Life Weekly (三聯生活周刊), a respected news magazine that had recently published sensitive investigative reports, including coverage of Beijing flooding and a rare story about cross-regional arrests. Both stories were subsequently deleted from Chinese internet platforms.

The scrubbing of Sanlian from the roster echoes the 2021 removal of Caixin Media, another respected outlet that has struggled over the past decade to maintain professional space. The updated 2025 list grew from 1,358 to 1,459 approved sources, with most additions being local government platforms — likely reflecting Beijing’s strategy to strengthen propaganda capabilities at the local level. Guangdong province alone added 59 new government-affiliated outlets.

Parade Crackdown

China intensified online censorship during its September 3 military parade, detaining or silencing social media users for mild criticism. According to China Digital Times, an Anhui resident who asked “What era is this still happening?” in a WeChat group was arrested within three hours and detained for ten days. Another user questioning why female soldiers wore makeup received a seven-day mute for “inciting hatred.” Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao reported that a 47-year-old Hubei man was also detained for “defamatory remarks” about the parade, while post-event search results overwhelmingly featured praise.