Skip to main content

Revising Hong Kong’s Past

As the history of the territory is revamped in a museum exhibit, deeply divergent press coverage of the changes reveals the fundamental values at stake.
|
A view of the new exhibit “The Hong Kong Story” at the Hong Kong Museum of History.

Last week, the Hong Kong Museum of History reopened its flagship permanent exhibit after more than five years of renovation. Do the math. The museum closed its doors just months after Hong Kong’s National Security Law was enacted on June 30, 2020 – and it has been closed ever since. The revamped exhibit, called “The Hong Kong Story“ in a nod to Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s storytelling formula for what the Chinese Communist Party calls “external propaganda,” displays over 2,800 artifacts spanning six millennia. But it’s the re-framing of the narratives threading the artifacts together that it most worth attention — that is, if you are a media outlet with even an iota of critical spirit.

Hong Kong’s Ming Pao newspaper, published by Malaysia’s Media Chinese International, was the only major outlet in Chinese to touch the story as a matter of journalistic truth-seeking. It ran a point-by-point comparison of the exhibit’s previous and new language. Among the changes noted was a complete erasure of references to the Tiananmen Massacre, which was recast as “political turmoil in the late spring and early summer of 1989.” Gone from the exhibit entirely, the Ming Pao reported, is a previous image that showed one million Hong Kongers taking to the streets in 1989 in support of the demonstrators in China.

Also apparent was the effort to recast the British acquisition of Hong Kong, previously described as “cession” (割讓) — language still widely used even in pro-establishment sources — as “forcible occupation” (強佔). Similarly, the 1967 leftist riots, previously referred to in the exhibit as the “1967 riots” (六七暴動), are now characterized as “Anti-British Resistance” (反英抗暴).

Government-aligned media outlets were notably uncritical. The Ta Kung Pao, published by China’s central government, ran a celebratory feature emphasizing how satisfied visitors are with the reopened exhibit. Sing Tao Daily previewed the new exhibit content with no critical evaluation whatsoever. The most brutally direct response came, unsurprisingly, from Hong Kong exile media outlets. UK-based Green Bean, an outlet run by exiled Hong Kong illustrators, posted a cartoon of a figure on a ladder hanging a new sign over the museum entrance that reads: “Falsification” (篡改).


David Bandurski is the director of the China Media Project, leading the project’s research and partnerships. David joined the team in 2004 after completing his master’s degree at Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism. He is the author of Dragons in Diamond Village (Penguin/Melville House), a book of reportage about urbanization and social activism in China, and co-editor of Investigative Journalism in China (HKU Press).

More Stories from this Region

As Hong Kong’s remaining independent media face intimidation and surveillance, their peers in the city’s diminished press corps see a story that can’t be told.
At an awards ceremony where independent outlets once competed on equal terms with state-run media, a Chinese Communist Party-controlled outlet has swept the field. It is…
The arrest of Book Punch founder Pong Yat-ming marks the latest escalation in Hong Kong’s crackdown on independent cultural life.
Hong Kong police demand an independent news outlet remove a news report about the suicide of a female officer — but the outlet refuses, citing public interest.
Hong Kong’s premier annual film event sidelines four films without explanation, raising concerns about political interference and artistic freedom.
Hong Kong’s leader urges civil servants to vote as a demonstration of loyalty, with state media demanding “unwavering support” for the electoral system.