Skip to main content

Tag: Hong Kong history

Revising Hong Kong’s Past

Last week, the Hong Kong Museum of History reopened its flagship permanent exhibit after more than five years of renovation. Do the math. The museum closed its doors just months after Hong Kong’s National Security Law was enacted on June 30, 2020 – and it has been closed ever since. The revamped exhibit, called “The Hong Kong Story“ in a nod to Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s storytelling formula for what the Chinese Communist Party calls “external propaganda,” displays over 2,800 artifacts spanning six millennia. But it’s the re-framing of the narratives threading the artifacts together that it most worth attention — that is, if you are a media outlet with even an iota of critical spirit.

Hong Kong’s Ming Pao newspaper, published by Malaysia’s Media Chinese International, was the only major outlet in Chinese to touch the story as a matter of journalistic truth-seeking. It ran a point-by-point comparison of the exhibit’s previous and new language. Among the changes noted was a complete erasure of references to the Tiananmen Massacre, which was recast as “political turmoil in the late spring and early summer of 1989.” Gone from the exhibit entirely, the Ming Pao reported, is a previous image that showed one million Hong Kongers taking to the streets in 1989 in support of the demonstrators in China.

Also apparent was the effort to recast the British acquisition of Hong Kong, previously described as “cession” (割讓) — language still widely used even in pro-establishment sources — as “forcible occupation” (強佔). Similarly, the 1967 leftist riots, previously referred to in the exhibit as the “1967 riots” (六七暴動), are now characterized as “Anti-British Resistance” (反英抗暴).

Government-aligned media outlets were notably uncritical. The Ta Kung Pao, published by China’s central government, ran a celebratory feature emphasizing how satisfied visitors are with the reopened exhibit. Sing Tao Daily previewed the new exhibit content with no critical evaluation whatsoever. The most brutally direct response came, unsurprisingly, from Hong Kong exile media outlets. UK-based Green Bean, an outlet run by exiled Hong Kong illustrators, posted a cartoon of a figure on a ladder hanging a new sign over the museum entrance that reads: “Falsification” (篡改).

Archives Against Amnesia

In a citizen effort to preserve several tons of protest memorabilia from Hong Kong covering the period from 2003 to 2019, Hong Kong exiles in Taiwan have established the “Hong Kong Action Archives” (香港行動文獻庫), which will safeguard a wide range of documents and relics — including flags, helmets, and documents from disbanded civic organizations dating back to the 1960s. The executive director of the organization creating the archives, identified in a report by exile outlet Photon Media as “Sam,” described their approach as “archival activism.” “Through these objects, we can reclaim Hong Kong’s history from state narratives,” he said. The group plans to launch an online museum within two years and will hold regular exhibitions, beginning with “Memories Face to Face” (記憶對視) in London next month, while a similar initiative, “Hong Kong Accountability Archive” (香港問責檔案庫), focused on documenting police enforcement videos during the 2019 protests, was also established in April.

The “Hong Kong Action Archives.” SOURCE: Photon Media.